If in a movie, its first-billed star, here Shirley MacLaine’s Eurasian girl Nicole Chang, is on shown right from the beginning, but is strictly deprived of any chance speaking her lines (provided it is not a mute role), and conspicuously sidelined to an expressionless doll adorned with exotic garbs, for a good 30 minutes, audience must have a hint that something is terribly amiss (apart from the unwitting connotation of rendering a woman voiceless simply at a man’s convenience).
Thus, it is the gambit of Ronald Neame’s comedic heist GAMBIT, about a cockney cat burglar Harry (Caine), who recruits Nicole to assist him in stealing a priceless statute from the Arabic magnate Shahbandar (Lom), by virtue of her uncanny resemblance with the latter’s late wife, deceased two decades ago, therefore Nicole can comport herself as a distraction while Harry carries out his daring grand larceny.
So the first half-hour during which Harry’s plan goes swimmingly well ends up to be pure figment in Harry’s head, and when their action actually takes place, nothing goes exactly as he has envisaged, mostly, Nicole proves to be an unknown quantity, instead of the mysterious, frigid, unattainable doppelgänger returning from the beyond to bewitch the clueless Shahbandar, she is a very earthy, art-savvy and romantic sort that mystique might be the last thing one could consider her of, meanwhile, Shahbandar is too worldly and crafty to fall for the quixotic charade either, already susses out the falsehood of their purported identities as Sir Harold and Lady Dean, he is amusingly piqued to play along with this battle of gamesmanship.
Outstanding for its faux-sumptuous art direction (looking dated to today’s eyes though, especially the security system guarding the precious art collections), costumes (Nicole’s cheongsams are timeless knockouts!) and foley artistry (which earned the film 3 Oscar nominations), GAMBIT loses some of its zest when the lovey-dovey whiff pluming into the story, Harry loosens his stiff upper lip and the air of haunter while Nicole simply yields to the spell of a bouquet of flowers, their temperamental incompatibility is pared down, taken over by less fetching romantic heebie-jeebies. Luckily, GAMBIT still has an ace in the hole, the payoff of Harry and Shahbandar’s “who can outfox who” macho gamble is a win-win situation, or more specially, one wins (both the girl and the material profit) while the other has no apparent loss.
By today’s yardstick, Hollywood’s antediluvian, racially insensitive modus operandi of casting Caucasian actors to play ethnic characters is simply unfeasible, Lom is browned under slap but articulates clipped English all fair and square; already impersonating a geisha in Jack Cardiff’s MY GEISHA (1962), MacLaine redeems the miscast with her chipper spontaneity and a force of proaction, that strikingly counterpoises Caine’s sterling persona of dispassion and faint irritation, all in all, insofar as a vintage caper, GAMBIT can still pass as a viable escapism fare.
referential entries: Neame’s HOPSCOTCH (1980, 7.8/10); Stanley Donen’s ARABESQUE (1966, 5.9/10); Jules Dassin’s TOPKAPI (1964, 7.2/10).
有趣的骗子电影。从某一方面也调侃了理想的女人与现实的女人的差别。
雪莉太可爱了,迈克尔凯恩年轻好帅。剧情设定以香港为起点,头三十分钟居然是想象,结局逻辑性差点意思,但还算是个轻松搞笑的犯罪片。
http://site.douban.com/124718/status/1691059048/
http://www.bilibili.com/video/av10317135/
Shirley从没有台词到开始说话那段的反差效果挺有趣。但毕竟是几十年前的片子,这类题材后来拍得太多了,后面的情节多少都在预料之中了……
……偷了个寂寞……偷了半天费了九牛二虎之力差点把人折进监狱结果说洗心革面就真的不干了。偷也没个好理由,不偷也没个好理由,冲突不知道去哪里了,本来挺好一题材,搞得平庸至极。你偷就还得偷哇,谁要看你为了爱情洗心革面。还说呢好朋友没接通电话从头到尾不见人影,原来最后成最大赢家了。女主身材也太好了。迈克尔凯恩年轻时候肿泡眼就看着不像好人很冷漠自大的样子,一直在利用女主一样,女主钻进笼子里去偷东西,他的不是担心紧张,还有点冷漠不服气的感觉,就女的不该比过我的意思。
它是属于六十年代的,六十年代的音乐、服饰、幽默,爱情。但在偷盗技术花样百出的现在,很难从中看到更多激动人心的。值得激赏的是那个年代最爱的纯真女孩打动冷面男子的戏码,麦克雷恩的灵巧活泼搭配上迈克尔凯恩的冷峻脱线,倒是相得益彰。
没有科恩兄弟改编的翻拍那么搞笑,但要更浪漫可爱一些,至少在正儿八经的窃贼电影里算幽默舒服。掉戒指half naked这个梗,到新版里就真的half naked了
节奏好,角色演绎不错。泽塔琼斯的偷天陷井里经典的舞技过关,是不是从这片启发而来?绝对被豆瓣打分低估的片。
还是60年代的偷盗片好玩。看看科恩兄弟如何改编。
75/100 臆想&现实的二分结构,增添了观赏的趣味性,且雪梨的造型与性格在幻想(高冷&严肃)与现实(俏皮&机灵)之间的巨大反差成功地塑造起了该角色,也促进了男女主之间情感火花的迸发。
跟《美国骗局》有点类似,都是导演玩的让观众猜猜谁更婊砸的游戏。另外那个超长的开头其实是跟整体故事平行的另一种可能,在没看完之前真是忍不住怀疑导演是不是把故事顺序剪错了。
30分钟预演大胆特别,女主角个性完全是我喜欢的类型,带动凯恩的冷幽默也跟着好笑。雪姨年轻时候太美了,见一部说一次
看新版前先看看老版,不过感觉比较一般。演员什么的都是大熟人了,迈克尔·凯恩年轻的时候专干偷盗的勾当。
虽然剧情很简单,视觉以及创意也并不难,但是前后两段反差感的确足够好笑,无论是对于富翁的刻板印象还是女主的刻板印象,在第二段故事里都颠覆了,而男主看似运筹帷幄,实际上无能狂怒,被耍的团团转。虽然最终是烂俗恋爱结局,但是妮可实在太可爱啦,值得一看哈哈
原版的富豪是一位正派而睿智,优雅又深情的人,新版改成了势利眼讨厌鬼,被偷也就不值得同情了~老版男主的死板,控制狂和自以为是比新版更甚,还是笨拙的科林显得可爱些~老版女主活泼跳脱,聪慧机敏,虽未受过高等教育却颇上得台盘,这才是艺术家想象中的女人~男主“想象中”那个外表光鲜内心空洞的提线木偶才更接近现实中的女人(抠鼻)~
最初的15分钟的计划设定让我一度以为这是部烂片,后面颠覆前情的转变比较有趣,这就是结构发挥功效之处。能预测到的结尾,可是也只有结尾才是亮点。
雪莉麦克雷恩与迈克尔凯恩的化学反应令本片大放异彩~
幻想中的偷盗部分比后面有趣,雪莉麦克雷恩穿着旗袍板着脸真的太好笑了。感情戏好扯,怎么看都是沙班达尔和妮可之间才有化学反应吧。这种人外有人的结尾有些出乎意料。迈克尔凯恩演得很烂。
我真纳闷60年代的Shirley Maclaine哪来那么多奇装异服~~~